Her behaviour during the writing of The Life of Charlotte Bronte was deplorable and, as such, I find it quite hard to take her seriously. Patrick comissioned her to write the memoir and she proceeded to write down lies about him based mostly on her own impressions on him - she had met him twice but maintained he had been a bad parent, which she had little or no evidence of. She did not allow either Patrick or Charlotte’s husband Arthur defend themselves and did not interview them. She then sent a letter veiled in vague legal language to trick Arthur into signing away all of Charlotte’s correspondence. Arthur had not given her permission to print lengthy extracts from her letters so she wanted to get around this. Elizabeth made things up and recounted lots of gossip that was generally regarded as not being true - which resulted in so many myths and lies about the Brontes lives at Haworth. She merely pandered to the appetite for sensationalism and tried to make the work of the Brontes seem palatable by claiming that it was because they were surrounded by an eccentric, unloving father and were shut away where no culture ever reached them and never read any newspapers/books etc. that they wrote such shocking, coarse novels. All lies. In the end, Patrick was blamed for the deaths of his wife and children which is horrendous.
I could rant about this all day. And George Smith, Charlotte’s publisher, is also to blame, because he aided Mrs Gaskell in this, but I think he was bitter because he was in love with Charlotte (despite ending up marrying some pretty young society thing).